If you’re lucky enough to enjoy a warm slice of cherry pie this holiday, you should probably thank the American kestrel.
It’s the smallest falcon in North America, which is roughly the size of a blue jay. And in some parts of Michigan — the nation's tart cherry capital — it helps farmers produce cherries.
Kestrels are predators, and they prey on insects, rodents, and other birds, many of which eat cherries. So when cherry farmers have kestrel nest boxes in their orchards, they see fewer cherry-eating birds, such as robins and grackles, as one 2018 study revealed. According to that study, farmers can save as much as $357 worth of cherries for every dollar they spend on installing nest boxes, which are essentially elevated wooden birdhouses. If kestrels move in, orchards have fewer bird pests, since the fierce little falcons eat them or scare the pests away.
Now, scientists have published another study that makes the benefits of the raptors even clearer.
It shows that orchards with occupied nest boxes have less damage — less eaten or partially eaten cherries — than those without kestrels. The authors also found that cherry orchards with kestrels had less bird poop.
That’s key, because avian excrement can carry pathogens, such as Campylobacter, a type of bacteria that can give people food poisoning.
Scientists first figured out that American kestrels are good for Michigan cherry growers by installing elevated nest boxes in orchards more than a decade ago. Those boxes often attract kestrels; after installing the boxes, the researchers compared orchards with and without kestrels, finding that there are fewer pest birds — species that eat cherries — when kestrels are present.
They published their results in a seminal 2018 paper, and it was a big deal. Farmers have a tough time managing fruit-eating birds. They typically can’t poison them, the way they control insects. And other measures, like covering crops with nets, are far more expensive. Kestrel nest boxes cost about $115, including installation (as of 2018), making them a cheap alternative. And the 2018 paper proved that they work.
The new study, published in late November, goes a step further. Michigan State University researcher Olivia Smith and her coauthors ultimately found more poop on branches in orchards without kestrels. The logic here is that avian pests are more common in kestrel-free orchards, and they defecate while raiding the cherries, Smith said.
The study also revealed that some of the poop contained Campylobacter, which can cause diarrhea in humans. That doesn’t mean that cherries from those orchards are always dangerous — but the study does suggest that kestrels may at least lower the amount of bacteria on cherries before they’re harvested, and thus lower the small risk that dirty orchards pose to consumers.
The unsung farm laborers
American kestrels aren’t the only wild predators helping produce our food. Starting in 2005, scientists relocated threatened falcons in New Zealand to wine vineyards that have a number of invasive avian pests, including blackbirds and song thrushes. Those invasive birds eat grapes. Subsequent research on the project, known as Falcons for Grapes, linked the introduction of falcons to a decrease in pest birds and a “95 percent reduction in the number of grapes removed relative to vineyards without falcons.”
Meanwhile, farmers around the world have for decades been relying on barn owls to control rats, pocket gophers, and other rodent pests that eat crops. Through a program in Israel, for example, farmers have installed thousands of owl nest boxes as an alternative to rodent-killing chemicals that can harm people and native wildlife. In recent years, as more and more farmers started using owl-attracting nest boxes, the use of rodenticide in Israel has plunged by 45 percent.
The role of birds varies from farm to farm, but broadly speaking, having predatory birds on the landscape — those that eat other animals, including insects and rodents — benefits crop production.
But if there’s one example that’s most impressive of all, it’s bats.
Most bat species in North America eat insects, including farm pests like moths and beetles. And research has shown that as bat populations plummet, farmers use more pesticides, presumably because bats aren’t there to eat pests. That means farmers spend more money growing the same amount of food, and they put more chemicals into the environment that can harm human health. A remarkable study published last year even linked the decline of bats to a rise in infant mortality.
“Nature is providing these services for humans for free,” said Julie Jedlicka, an ecologist at Missouri Western State University, who was not involved in the research. The question, she said, is, “How can we take advantage of that?”
The irony, of course, is that farmland is the leading killer of wildlife and natural ecosystems. In fact, the agricultural sector, broadly, has contributed to the decline of predatory birds, including kestrels, as farmland replaced natural nesting cavities and pesticides kill off their prey.
What these studies show is that bringing back at least some natural features of the landscape, such as avian predators, can be good for farmers — and those of us who indulge in the literal fruits of their labor.
