Perverse Incentives are Poisoning the WellThink creator payouts are lifting up talent? Think again. Social media’s reward systems are driving creators into a race for views, churning out content at all costs. Here’s how it’s breaking the creator economy.
Perverse incentives are the hidden traps lurking in "well-intentioned" policies—unintended consequences that sabotage the very goals they’re meant to achieve. These incentives create feedback loops that drive behaviors against their original purpose, propelling systems into destructive, self-defeating cycles. Social media is laced with perverse incentives that are as extreme as they are destructive, embedded deep within creator payment programs and engagement algorithms. These systems claim to reward creators, boost content, and drive engagement, but in reality, they ignite a brutal race: quantity over quality, popularity over substance. And let’s be fucking clear—it’s a race straight to the bottom. Here’s how it plays out: platforms reward whatever goes viral, sacrificing thoughtful, genuine posts in the process. Creators are pressured to churn out attention-grabbing, sensational content just to stay visible. The natural and entirely predictable outcome is a collection of ass-first newsfeeds full of crass, monotonous, and downright ugly content—a relentless stream of shallow, sensational material that erodes trust and drags down content standards across the board. In their relentless pursuit of profit and endless engagement, social media platforms are building an PVP ecosystem that values clicks over connection, jeopardizing their own communities and poisoning their own wells, while treating users like brainless cattle. The Rise of Creator Payment ProgramsIn a bid to lock in creators, social media platforms have unleashed a range of lucrative payment programs. YouTube leads with a 55% ad revenue share, paying out over $9 billion to creators in 2022 alone—a staggering sum that sets the industry standard. Not to be outdone, TikTok launched its $1 billion Creator Fund in 2020 and recently doubled down with its Creativity Program Beta, which some say boosts earnings up to 20 times the previous structure. Meta, owning Facebook, Threads and Instagram, also promises a 55% ad revenue split but keeps exact payout details shrouded in mystery. They sweeten the pot with a $1 billion fund aimed at pushing Reels content and thousands of dollars paid out to Threads creators through the Threads bonus program. Snapchat enters the mix with direct payments from $1,000 to $25,000 per creator, while Twitter, now rebranded as X, offers Payouts, Super Follows and tipping as monetization options. Along with anything else Musk can dream up in his allegedly Ketamine fueled "brainstorms." These programs are a clear admission from social media giants: creators hold the keys to audience engagement. By paying creators directly, platforms hope to spark more frequent posting and keep creators loyal. In theory, it’s a win-win—platforms get the engagement they crave, and creators gain a steady income stream. But while these payouts have fueled a surge in content, they’ve also unleashed a wave of fucked up motivations, where the push to “create” prioritizes sensationalism and quantity over genuine innovation and depth. How Payment Programs Create Perverse IncentivesPosting Frequency Over QualityPlatforms reward frequent posting, and creators quickly learn that maintaining a steady stream of content boosts their visibility and maximizes payout potential. This dynamic creates a clear trade-off: quantity over quality. To keep up, creators are pressured to churn out content rapidly, sacrificing thoughtfulness and creativity in favor of speed and volume. Controversial and Extreme ContentAlgorithms favor content that triggers strong reactions. Whether through outrage or excitement, engagement metrics reward the provocative over the nuanced. In the race for views, creators feel compelled to push boundaries, producing increasingly extreme or controversial content. This drives platforms toward divisive narratives and sensationalist headlines, amplifying the loudest voices over the most thoughtful ones. Trend-Driven and Imitative ContentOriginality takes time, but social media rewards imitation. Trend-driven content—often recycled from popular formats—gains higher visibility, pushing creators to replicate instead of innovate. This cycle floods platforms with redundant material, burying unique voices in a sea of sameness. Clickbait and Misleading ContentThe relentless race for clicks has bred a culture of sensational thumbnails, inflated headlines, and shameless clickbait. Creators know the game: platforms reward engagement, no matter how hollow the content. The result? Audiences are flooded with flashy but empty posts, drowning real value in a sea of shallow noise. The Decline of Content QualityWith perverse incentives driving the system, platforms are drowning in derivative, spammy, and often extreme content. As engagement metrics take precedence, posts offering genuine value and thoughtful perspectives are buried in the noise. Creators are pushed to chase algorithm-friendly metrics over authenticity and substance because their visibility—and income—depends on it. This relentless focus on engagement distorts the content landscape, prioritizing clicks and virality over quality and depth. This race to the bottom shows up in multiple damaging ways. First, it erodes trust. Audiences, increasingly skeptical of creators’ motives, now question whether content exists to inform or simply to rack up views. As Brendan Schneider put it, “There’s a difference between creating content and creating value. One gets attention, the other gets trust.” Audiences feel this erosion acutely—they’re seeing the quality drop and are pulling back from platforms they once valued. As trust wanes, so does meaningful engagement, undercutting the long-term bond between creators and their audiences. This fixation on attention over substance exposes a deep misalignment in how social media platforms reward creators. By prioritizing clicks, platforms reduce creators to mere engines of engagement, sidelining their role in building genuine connections. Erik Qualman calls out this flawed approach, asking, “Why are we trying to measure social media like a traditional channel anyway? Social media touches every facet of business and is more an extension of good business ethics.” Yet under today’s incentive structures, social media’s business model undercuts its ethics, sacrificing the promise of authentic connection for hollow engagement. Creators are already voicing frustration with social media payment structures. TikTok creator Jess Zafarris observed a significant decline in her Creator Fund earnings, despite maintaining consistent views and engagement. She noted, “Originally, I could make like $2.50 off of a single video. Now, that same video… would make three to five cents.” Similarly, Instagram creator Jontá Harris found Meta’s Reels bonus program “not worth the effort,” suspecting that his engagement was deliberately stifled to limit payout obligations. Beyond EngagementPlatforms need to radically realign their incentives to prioritize quality over raw engagement. Or they'll find that networks have a habit of going elsewhere. Instead of feeding the relentless drive for views and clicks, they should focus on metrics that actually matter: watch time, completion rates, and user satisfaction scores. By elevating content that captivates and retains audiences, platforms would give creators a powerful reason to produce work that resonates. This shift could (could doing a lot of heavy lifting here, I'll admit) slow the spread of sensationalism, rewarding real, lasting engagement over empty clicks. And by tapping into qualitative feedback—user surveys and thoughtful comment analysis—platforms could uncover what truly adds value, ditching shallow metrics that only capture fleeting attention. Platforms deliberately avoid promoting alternative income streams, aiming to keep us - all of us - dependent on their ecosystems and locked into the cycle of algorithm-driven revenue. But creators can break free by carving out their own revenue paths—through sponsorships, subscriptions, micro-payments, and direct tips. Diversifying income allows creators to focus on authentic content that aligns with their values and truly resonates with their audience, sidestepping the relentless grip of platform-controlled algorithms that shift on a whim. Shifting away from the relentless push for virality could open the door to richer, niche communities. Platforms could prioritize content that fosters strong connections within passionate, focused audiences, rather than forcing creators to chase mass appeal. Mark Schaefer captures this perfectly: “The new era demands a focus on ignition, not just content; on trust, not just traffic; and on the elite people in your audience who are spreading and advocating your content.” Building smaller, dedicated followings isn’t just a good idea; it could redefine success by cultivating spaces that value depth over reach—where creators thrive without the pressure of going viral. Realigning with intrinsic motivation over platform metrics could also reshape how creators view their work. As creator Matthew Kobach put it, “The value of creating content is that you learn about yourself. Gaining an audience is just a bonus.” Self-expression, personal growth, and authentic connection with their audience could take precedence over the mindless churn of content for the sake of staying visible. Shifting focus from relentless growth to meaningful creation could be the antidote to the burnout and superficiality that plagues the creator economy. Social media’s bonus programs and payout schemes might have started with good intentions, but they’ve devolved into incentives for creators to churn out low-quality, disposable content for cheap clicks and empty virality. Shallow, attention-grabbing fluff now smothers authentic, meaningful work. If platforms are serious about creating a healthier ecosystem, they need a brutal overhaul of their reward systems—one that pushes creators toward genuine connections and sustainable income, unshackled from the insatiable demand for growth at any cost. And if the rest of us are serious about creating and consuming quality content we have to resist bullshit incentives and the fuckery they produce. A genuinely vibrant social media landscape requires creators and platforms to break the hell out of the metrics trap. Enough with the mindless chase for clicks and views—thoughtful, high-quality content is the real backbone of building a loyal, trusting audience. As a new wave of creators steps up, the ones who give a damn about quality and authenticity will set themselves apart from the noise—not because of some shallow reach metric, but because they’re actually building connections that matter.
|